The Kyne Protocol - Frequently Asked Questions

Welcome to The Kyne Protocol! Our analysis is designed to give you a strategic edge by providing clear, data-driven insights. Here’s a quick guide to help you interpret your daily analysis and get the most out of our work.

What is the main table in each race analysis?

That is our Unified Multi-Model Analysis Table. It’s the heart of the protocol. For each race, we run our analysis three different ways to find a consensus. This table summarizes those findings and ranks the horses based on how consistently they perform across all models.

What are the "A," "B," and "C" Confidence Tiers?

This is our simple, powerful way of categorizing contenders:

• 'A' Horses: These are your primary contenders. They ranked highly across all three of our analytical models, showing consistent, multi-faceted strength. These are your most likely winners.

• 'B' Horses: These are strong secondary contenders. They showed high potential in some, but not all, of our models. They are prime candidates to complete exotic wagers (like exactas and trifectas) and are the most likely horses to upset an 'A' contender.

• 'C' Horses: These are high-impact outliers or "specialists." They are horses that only one model flagged as a top contender, suggesting a specific, potent angle (e.g., pure speed, a big class drop) that warrants a small, protective wager.

What is the "Average Stiel Score"?

The Stiel Score is our internal, proprietary power rating for each horse, running on a 1-100 scale, with higher being better. The Average Stiel Score is the average score a horse received across our three models. While a higher score is better, it's most useful as a tool for comparing horses within the same race. The ranking of the horses in the table is more important than the raw score itself.

What do the "Confidence" levels (High, Medium, Low/PASS) mean?

This is our most important recommendation, telling you IF we think you should bet a race.

• High Confidence: These are our strongest, most confident opinions of the day. The data points to a clear and valuable wagering opportunity.

• Medium Confidence: These are solid opportunities where the data gives us a clear edge, but with slightly less certainty than a "High" confidence race.

• Low / PASS: These races are flagged as unpredictable and chaotic. Our analysis suggests the outcome is too random to risk capital. The most profitable move in a bad race is often not to play.

How should I think about the Bankroll and Wager Costs?

The $250 daily bankroll and the associated wager costs in our "Wagering Recommendations" table are for demonstration purposes only. They are a hypothetical model to show how we would allocate capital based on our confidence levels in a disciplined way.

You should ALWAYS bet responsibly and within your own personal budget and comfort level. The costs we list are a guide to strategic allocation, not a directive on how much you should spend.

Why is a race with a strong "A" horse sometimes a "PASS"?

Our guiding principle is 'Profit, not Pride.' Some types of races, like maiden claiming events for inexperienced horses, are inherently volatile. Even if we identify a strong contender, the protocol's rules may designate the race as a "PASS" because the overall risk and unpredictability are too high. Protecting your capital by skipping bad bets is just as important as winning good ones.